Saturday, March 14, 2020
Van Helsing and Dr Seward Essay Example
Van Helsing and Dr Seward Essay Example Van Helsing and Dr Seward Paper Van Helsing and Dr Seward Paper During the Victorian era the advancement of technology was immense. Van Helsing and Dr Seward are the two characters who do the most debating on science and scientific method. In chapter fourteen Dr Seward describes his predicament: I do not know what to think, and I have no data on which to found a conjecture. It is, therefore, quite clear that these two characters face difficulties, this is because, the supernatural events in Dracula conflict with their rational and religious beliefs. Significantly, Van Helsing asks Dr Seward To believe in things that you cannot, seemingly highlighting the apparent conflict between science and the supernatural. Stoker introduces the supernatural in chapter one, with the wolves, with white teeth and lolling red tongues that the coach driver presumably Dracula appears to control, as well as the blue flames. This early introduction of supernatural phenomena prepares the reader for the horrific and violent acts in the novel, whilst also, presenting a sense of uncertainty as there appears to be no explanation for these uncanny events. It could, therefore, be suggested that Stoker is setting up the idea that there is not always an answer to every question. Van Helsing acknowledges that there are some possible impossibilities, thus, it would seem that he is characterised by Stoker as pivotal within the novel, as more then just a man of science, but as a character who believes and is aware that there are some questions that do not have answers. Moreover, as a character, Van Helsing is extremely open-minded, he is critical of Dr Seward who lacks this, and is instead, seemingly, dismissive of phenomena which cannot be explained. This is highlighted in chapter 14 when Van Helsing realises that Lucy was a vampire, consequently telling Dr Seward that he is to prejudiced, and that it is the fault of science that it wants to explain all. It would therefore seem that Stoker does not have an answer for everything, this is perhaps epitomised by Reinfield who is characterised as a madman who clearly does not conform to normal human behaviour. The mystery of Reinfields madness consequently places the idea that Stoker cannot provide answers to every question at the forefront of the readers mind, this is because the character is presented as unlike the normal lunatic with no reason or explanation given within the novel regarding the reason of his mad and erratic ways.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)